Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.27 seconds)

Vimalben Ajitbhai Patel vs Vatslabeen Ashokbhai Patel And Others on 14 March, 2008

30. Having regard to the decisions in Vimalaben Ajitbhai Patel (Supra), this Court is of the opinion that appellant, who retired from service in the year 2018 and is in his old age, surviving on his pension, bearing responsibility of his wife and in whose self acquired property No.B-140 respondent has been given right to stay and residence, cannot be further shouldered with responsibility of paying maintenance to his daughter-in- law. In our opinion, the respondent is not entitled to benefit of maintenance under the provisions of Section 19 of the Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 175 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Laxmi & Anr vs Shyam Pratap & Anr on 28 April, 2022

24. A coordinate Bench of this Court (of which one of us, Neena Bansal Krishna, J, was a member) in Laxmi & Anr. Vs. Shyam Pratap & Anr. 2022 SCC OnLine Del 1387 dealt with a case wherein the widowed daughter-in-law claimed maintenance from her in-laws (respondents) under Section 19 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 on the ground that even if the properties owned by them were self acquired, she is entitled to maintenance, observed and held as under:-
Delhi High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1