Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.56 seconds)Section 6 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Mahinder Singh And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 26 March, 2009
4 of the Act was issued on 5.6.1992 and declaration under Section 6 of the
Act was issued on 4.6.1993 as the award could not be passed within the
stipulated period of one year, and the acquisition proceedings elapsed.
Notification under Section 4 of the Act was thereafter issued on 3.7.1995
followed by notification under Section 6 of the Act on 2.7.1996. The same
were challenged in C.W.P.No.13660 of 1998 titled as Mahinder Singh and
others vs. State of Haryana and 30 other connected writ petitions. A
Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.5.1999 (Annexure P-15)
found fatal infirmity in non-compliance of Section 4 (1) of the Act as the
State failed to publish the notifications in the regional language. This Court
though did not quash the notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Act but
held that the land of the petitioners in those writ petitions shall not be
acquired despite the Award given by the Land Acquisition Collector in
pursuance of the impugned notifications. Thus, the proceedings for
acquisition of land of the petitioners in those writ petitions stood not
matured.
Section 17 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 300A in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Delhi Administration vs Gurdip Singh Uban And Ors. Etc on 18 August, 2000
Similar view has been taken by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
the case of Delhi Administration vs. Gurdip Singh Uban and others etc.,
(1999) 7 SCC 44.