Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.29 seconds)Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 467 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Pratibha Manchanda vs The State Of Haryana on 7 July, 2023
26. He submitted that the permission dated 10 September 2011
was obtained on a declaration made on behalf of one Dhaneshwar
Patil, who had passed away on 30 May 2008. Based on this
declaration, Sharad and Shubham were shown as entitled to
purchase the land. He relied on the judgment of the Supreme
Court in Pratibha Manchanda and another versus State of Haryana
11
::: Uploaded on - 25/11/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 25/11/2025 21:04:42 :::
aba2633-2025.doc
and another, reported in (2023) 8 SCC 181. He submitted that in
cases involving land grabbing the Supreme Court has held that
anticipatory bail should not be granted. He submitted that the
Supreme Court has held that delay in filing the FIR is not material
when the forgeries are evident and when the complainant had no
prior knowledge of collusive civil proceedings and successive
transactions.