Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 36 (0.35 seconds)Section 37 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014
"36. Associated Builders v. DDA, (2015) 3 SCC 49, may
Executive Engineer, Civil Division-I, I & FC Department Delhi Vs. Virtual
Infrastructure Contractors and Engineers
ARBTN No. 160/2020 Page 57 of 69
justifiably be christened as the high watermark in the law
relating to Section 34 of the Act, and any attempt to paraphrase
the decision is fraught with the risk of mutilation. The decision
is, almost entirely, definitively authoritative, and brooks no
ambiguity or anomaly.
Section 37 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Mmtc Ltd. vs M/S.Vedanta Ltd. on 18 February, 2019
This Court, inter alia,
held as under : (MMTC case [MMTC Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd., (2019)
4 SCC 163 : (2019) 2 SCC (Civ) 293] , SCC pp. 166-67, paras
11-14)
"11. As far as Section 34 is concerned, the position is well-
The Arbitration Act, 1940
Section 5 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 96 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Uhl Power Company Ltd. vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh Multi ... on 7 January, 2022
(a) UHL Power Company Ltd. Vs. State of Himachal
Pradesh in Civil Appeal No. 10341/2011 and State of Himachal
Pradesh Vs. UHL Power Company Ltd in Civil Appeal No.
10342/2011 (2022)(1) R.A.J. 193(SC) passed by Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India;