Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (1.00 seconds)Lachmi Narain vs Muhammad Yusuf And Ors. on 21 April, 1920
I agree with the contention that the Court below wrongly distinguished the decision of this Court in Lachmi Narain v. Muhammad Yusuf, AIR 1920 All 284 (supra) and held that the application dated 9-7-1962 could be treated as an application for setting aside the abatement and for bringing on record the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased respondent Banwarl Lal.
Babaji Padhan vs Mst. Gurubara Padhani And Ors. on 21 April, 1961
Following the decisions in AIR 1928 Lahore 746 and AIR 1920 All 284 : ILR 42 All 540 (supra) the Orissa High Court took the same view in Babajl Padhan v. Mst. Gurubara Padhani, AIR 1962 Orissa 94.
Sri Ram Prasad vs The State Bank Of Bikaner And Ors. on 21 March, 1972
Trivedi J. in Sri Ram Prasad v. State Bank of Blkaner, AIR 1972 All 456 observed :
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Mt. Kulsoomun Nissa And Anr. vs Noor Mohammad Alias Sultan Haider And ... on 8 May, 1936
In the above mentioned decision, reliance was placed on the Division Bench decision of this Court in Mt. Kulsoomun Nissa v. Noor Mohamad. AIR 1936 All 666. The submission made is supported by two decisions cited above and must consequently prevail."
Kunhikayyumma And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 12 September, 1983
In Kunhikayyumma v. Union of India, AIR 1984 Kerala 184, it was held in follows (Paragraph Nos. 6 and 12 of the said AIR) :--
Union Of India vs Ram Charan & Others on 30 April, 1963
12. The decision of the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Ram Charan, AIR 1964 SC 215, on which reliance was placed by counsel for the appellants is not as absolute as may be thought of at first sight, No doubt, the insistence on there being sufficient cause forgetting aside the abatement had been highlighted in that decision. However, a close reading of para 12 of the judgment, particularly the last sentence thereof, would point out that the position is not one of absolute inflexibility. That clearly is the effect of the following passage contained therein.