Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.19 seconds)
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs Vipin Kumar And 8 Others on 19 February, 2020 cites

Manjuri Bera vs Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. And Anr on 30 March, 2007

2. According to the appellant, the Tribunal has misread the evidence led before it and has erroneously considered the income of the deceased who was 63 years of age to be Rs.4,500/- per month. Unfortunately, the Tribunal did not deduct any amount for personal expenses of the deceased on the ground that the deceased was not dependent on any of his sons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that if it is done, the judgment of the Apex Court in Smt. Manjuri Bera Vs. Oriental Insurance Company, Limited, AIR 2007 SC 1474 would be applicable. He does not dispute the grant of multiplier but disputes the amount of Rs.70,000/- granted for non-pecuniary damages.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 369 - A Pasayat - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Vidyawati Devi And Others on 8 August, 2019

4. It is further submitted by Sri Ojha, that as the Court is recalculating the compensation, in view of the decision of this Court F.A.F.O. No.2389 of 2016 (National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Vidyawati Devi And 2 Others) decided on 27.7.2016 and under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) of C.P.C., he would like to press the issue of interest which should be at the rate of 9% and not 7% as granted by the Tribunal in view of the decision of this Court in National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Lavkush and another, 2018 (1) T.A.C. 431.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 14 - H Kumar - Full Document

National Insurance Company Limited, ... vs Lavkush & Anr. on 21 March, 2017

4. It is further submitted by Sri Ojha, that as the Court is recalculating the compensation, in view of the decision of this Court F.A.F.O. No.2389 of 2016 (National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Vidyawati Devi And 2 Others) decided on 27.7.2016 and under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) of C.P.C., he would like to press the issue of interest which should be at the rate of 9% and not 7% as granted by the Tribunal in view of the decision of this Court in National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Lavkush and another, 2018 (1) T.A.C. 431.
Allahabad High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 110 - S Agarwal - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi Son Of Late Prashant Sethi ... on 20 April, 2011

5. Having heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the judgment and order impugned. Recently the Apex Court for a labourer also has considered that the minimum wage would be Rs.6,000/-, hence, submission of learned counsel for the appellant that the income of Rs.4500/- granted by the Tribunal is bad, cannot be accepted. However, his submission that 1/3rd should have been at least deducted towards the personal expenses of the deceased if not the entire amount. I am unable to accept the submission of learned counsel for the appellant that Rs.70,000/- should not be paid for filial consortium as the said is in consonance with the judgment in National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and Others, 2017 0 Supreme (SC) 1050
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 10133 - K Kannan - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd. vs Birender on 13 January, 2020

7. Hence, Rs.2,52,000 + Rs.70,000/- = 3,22,000/- would be the compensation awardable to the heirs of the deceased to be equally distributed as per the judgment of the Tribunal. The amount will carry interest at the rate of 9% in view of the decision of the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.242/243 of 2020 (National Insurance Company Ltd. vs Birender and others) decided on 13 January, 2020 which is the latest in point of time.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 366 - A M Khanwilkar - Full Document
1