Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.25 seconds)Section 107 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sanju @ Sanjay Singh Sengar vs State Of M.P on 1 May, 2002
8 Applying
the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in above referred to
judgments to the facts of instant case, we are of the considered
opinion that mere allegations which are general in nature with
regard to the deceased was subjected to mental and physical cruelty
at the hands of the accused, offence under Section 306 cannot be
proved.
Ajit Savant Majagavi vs State Of Karnataka on 14 August, 1997
11.
This is an acquittal appeal. The principles which would
govern and regulate the hearing of appeal by the High Court against
an order of acquittal passed by the Trial Court have been very
succinctly explained by the Supreme Court in the matter of AJIT
SAVANT MAJAGAVI VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA, reported
in AIR 1997 p.3255.
Anokh Singh vs State Of Punjab on 29 November, 1991
12 In
ANOKH SINGH vs. STATE OF
PUNJAB, reported in AIR 1992 SC p.598, Supreme Court has
held that in an appeal against acquittal, the High Court should
attach greater weight to appreciation of evidence by the Trial Judge
who had the occasion to watch the demeanour of the witnesses.
Ramesh Babulal Doshi vs The State Of Gujarat on 2 May, 1996
13 It
is a cardinal principle of criminal jurisprudence that in an
acquittal appeal if other view is possible then also appellate
Court cannot substitute its own view by reversing the acquittal into
conviction, unless the findings of the trial Court are perverse,
contrary to the material on record, palpably wrong, manifestly
erroneous or demonstrably unsustainable. (See Ramesh Babulal
Doshi V. State of Gujarat (1996) 9 SCC 225). In the instant
case, the learned APP has not been able to point out to us as to
how the findings recorded by the trial Court are perverse,
contrary to material on record, palpably wrong, manifestly
erroneous or demonstrably unsustainable.
Section 313 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Sushil Kumar Sharma vs Union Of India And Ors on 19 July, 2005
(i)
In case of SUSHIL KUMAR SHARMA vs. UNION OF INDIA,
reported in 2005 AIR SCW p.3569, the Supreme Court makes it very
abundantly clear that mere harassment or cruelty by the husband or
his relatives would not constitute an offence of abetting the
commission of suicide. Supreme Court in four lines has explained the
correct position of law very succinctly. The relevant paragraph is
reproduced herein below :