Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (0.27 seconds)
Jainendra Singh vs State Of U.P.Tr.Prinl.Sec.Home & Ors on 30 July, 2012 cites

Ram Chandra Kailash Kumar And Company ... vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 25 March, 1980

In the unreported decision in Ram Kumar Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.(supra), while suppression of the registration of a criminal case against the appellant therein was not in dispute; it was held that what was required to be considered by the appointing authority was to satisfy himself as to the suitability of the applicant to the post based on the nature of crime alleged against the applicant. It was held:
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 294 - N L Untwalia - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs M. Bhaskaran on 30 October, 1995

xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx The aggrieved are all those who had similar or even better qualifications than the appointee or appointees but who had not applied for the post because they did not possess the qualifications mentioned in the advertisement. It amounts to a fraud on public to appoint persons with inferior qualifications in such circumstances unless it is clearly stated that the qualifications are relaxable. No court should be a party to the perpetuation of the fraudulent practice. It is of course true as noted by the Tribunal that the facts of the case in the aforesaid decision were different from the facts of the present case. And it is also true that in that case pending the service which was continued pursuant to the order of the Tribunal the candidate concerned acquired the requisite qualification and hence his appointment was not disturbed by this Court. But that is neither here not there. As laid down in the aforesaid decision, if by committing fraud any employment is obtained, such a fraudulent practice cannot be permitted to be countenanced by a court of law. Consequently, it must be held that the Tribunal had committed a patent error of law in directing reinstatement of the respondent- workmen with all consequential benefits.” (Emphasis added)
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 424 - S B Majmudar - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs Bipad Bhanjan Gayen on 9 May, 2008

In Daya Shankar Yadav Vs. Union of India & Ors. (supra), all the earlier decisions right from Delhi Administration through its Chief Secretary and Ors. Vs. Sushil Kumar (supra) ending with Union of India & Ors. Vs. Bipad Bhanjan Gayen(supra) including Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan Vs. Ram Ratan Yadav(supra) were considered in detail and the preposition of law was laid down as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 40 - H S Bedi - Full Document
1   2 3 Next