Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.29 seconds)

Maridev (M.) (M. Mariyappa) vs State Of Mysore And Ors. on 23 February, 1968

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the Petition Papers, we decline indulgence in the matter broadly agreeing with the reasons which the Tribunal has assigned in the impugned order. When a person is placed in a post on independent charge basis under Rule 32 of KCSR, it is not a case of promotion, is well established vide M.MARIDEV vs. STATE OF MYSORE3. However, where such a person is placed merely in independent charge though he was entitled to be promoted to the said post and subsequently he has been accorded retrospective promotion as contradistinguished from notional promotion, he cannot be denied the arrears of salary in the pay scale admissible to the said post. This view accords with doctrine against begar enacted in 1 AIR 1998 SC 3164 2 MANU/KA/8640/2019 3 1968(1)MyLJ 325 -5- NC: 2024:KHC:43791-DB WP No. 7628 of 2024 Article 23 of the Constitution of India. H.M.Seervai,4 a jurist of yester decades explains 'begar', as under:
Karnataka High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 13 - Full Document
1