Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.69 seconds)Section 106 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 63 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
J T Surappa S/O Late J S Thimmappaiah vs Sri Satchidhananadendra Saraswathi ... on 16 April, 2008
He has relied upon another decision of the Hon'ble High
Court of Karnataka reported in ILR 2008 KAR 2115
between J.T. Surappa & Anr. Vs Sri.
Satchidhanandendra Saraswathi Swamiji Public
Charitable Trust & Ors. Wherein, it was held that, five
22 O.S.No.4867/2015
steps to be considered by the Court while
appreciation of evidence on the execution of the WILL.
Niranjan Umeshchandra Joshi .. ... vs Mrudula Jyoti Rao & Ors. .. Respondents on 15 December, 2006
39. The learned advocate appearing for the
defendants has relied upon a decision report in (2006)
13 SCC 433 between Niranjan Umesh Chandra Joshi Vs
Mrudula Jyoti Rao & Ors. It was held that:
Karnataka Rent Act, 1999
Section 109 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 109 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Adivekka & Ors vs Hanamavva Kom Venkatesh (D) By Lrs. & Anr on 9 May, 2007
He has relied another decision reported in (2007) SCC
91 between Adivikka & Ors. Vs Hanamavva Kom
Venkatesh dead by LR's & Anr wherein it was held that
'The WILL made by terminally ill testator just 2
weeks before his death, minor children dis-inherited in
favour of nephews and also number of suspicious
circumstances remained unxplained. Genuineness of
the will doubtfully'.
H. Venkatachala Iyengar vs B. N. Thimmajamma & Others on 13 November, 1958
The learned advocate appearing for the defendants has
also relied upon a decision reported in AIR 1959 SC 443
between H. Venkatachala Iyengar Vs B.N. Kimmajamma
& Ors., wherein it was held that
'Onus of proof on propounder of the WILL'.
1