Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
M/S. Heinz India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 23 March, 2012
In the case
of Heinz India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. State of UP &
Ors.3, this Court referred to the position held on
the power of judicial review in the case of Reid v.
Secretary of State for Scotland4, wherein it is
stated that :-
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Shalini Shyam Shetty & Anr vs Rajendra Shankar Patil on 23 July, 2010
It is relevant to mention that in the case of
Shalini Shyam Shetty & Anr. v. Rajendra Shankar
13
C.A. @ SLP (C) No. 22798 of 2013
Patil1, with regard to the limitations of the High
Court to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 227,
it was held in para 49 that-
Section 35 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Harjinder Singh vs Punjab State Warehousing Corp on 5 January, 2010
In the case of Harjinder Singh v. Punjab State
Warehousing Corporation2, this Court held that,
"20......In view of the above
discussion, we hold that the
1
(2010) 8 SCC 329
2
(2010) 3 SCC 192
14
C.A. @ SLP (C) No. 22798 of 2013
learned Single Judge of the High
Court committed serious
jurisdictional error and
unjustifiably interfered with the
award of reinstatement passed by
the Labour Court with compensation
of Rs.87,582 by entertaining a
wholly unfounded plea that the
appellant was appointed in
violation of Articles 14 and 16 of
the Constitution and the
Regulation."
1