Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (3.35 seconds)
Sukumar vs Defence on 27 March, 2026 cites

Tribhuvandas Purshottamdas Thakur vs Ratilal Motilal Patel on 5 September, 1967

17. A coordinate bench cannot comment upon the discretion exercised or judgment rendered by another coordinate bench of the same court. The rule of precedent is binding for the reason that there is a desire to secure uniformity and certainty in law. Thus, in judicial administration precedents which enunciate rules of law form the foundation of the administration of justice under our system. Therefore, it has always been insisted that the decision of a coordinate bench must be followed. (Vide: Tribhovandas Purshottamdas Thakkar v. Ratilal Motilal Patel & Ors., AIR 1968 SC 372; Sub-Committee of Judicial Accountability v. Union of India & KOMAL RANI KOMA CAT Bangalore 2026.03.30 L RANI17:32:34 +05'30' 25 OA No.170/00550/2024/CAT/BANGALORE Ors., (1992) 4 SCC 97; and State of Tripura v. Tripura Bar Association & Ors., (1998) 5 SCC 637).
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 340 - J C Shah - Full Document

State Of Tripura vs Tripura Bar Association And Ors. on 16 April, 1998

17. A coordinate bench cannot comment upon the discretion exercised or judgment rendered by another coordinate bench of the same court. The rule of precedent is binding for the reason that there is a desire to secure uniformity and certainty in law. Thus, in judicial administration precedents which enunciate rules of law form the foundation of the administration of justice under our system. Therefore, it has always been insisted that the decision of a coordinate bench must be followed. (Vide: Tribhovandas Purshottamdas Thakkar v. Ratilal Motilal Patel & Ors., AIR 1968 SC 372; Sub-Committee of Judicial Accountability v. Union of India & KOMAL RANI KOMA CAT Bangalore 2026.03.30 L RANI17:32:34 +05'30' 25 OA No.170/00550/2024/CAT/BANGALORE Ors., (1992) 4 SCC 97; and State of Tripura v. Tripura Bar Association & Ors., (1998) 5 SCC 637).
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 46 - Full Document

Rajasthan Public Service Commission ... vs Harish Kumar Purohit And Ors on 1 April, 2003

In Rajasthan Public Service Commission & Anr. v. Harish Kumar Purohit & Ors., (2003) 5 SCC 480, this Court held that a bench must follow the decision of a coordinate bench and take the same view as has been taken earlier. The earlier decision of the coordinate bench is binding upon any latter coordinate bench deciding the same or similar issues. If the latter bench wants to take a different view than that taken by the earlier bench, the proper course is for it to refer the matter to a larger bench......."
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 41 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 Next