Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.38 seconds)

Awdesh Vasistha Tiwari And Ors. vs The Chief Executive Officer, Slum ... on 26 April, 2006

In Awdesh Vasistha Tiwari Vs. Chief Executive Officer, (2006) 4 Mh.L.J. 282, a Division Bench of this Court considered DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations of Greater Mumbai, 1991 and held that if 70% of the slum-dwellers on a particular area come together and apply after formation of proposed co-operative housing society, the said application has to be independently considered in accordance with law. The scheme does not contemplate simultaneous consideration of such an application made by a proposed society with an application subsequently made by another proposed society relating to the same land. The applicant society has to have 70% support which obviously two societies cannot have. The application received first is to be processed first independently. If it fails to get 70% support, the second application can be considered. The obvious intention is to avoid unhealthy competition between different builders who are interested in supporting such societies. It was held as follows:-
Bombay High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 24 - A Oka - Full Document

Tulsiwadi Navnirman Coop. Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ... on 1 November, 2007

Upholding the objection of Indira and Om Omega, the Division Bench directed Shiv Kripa to approach the HPC constituted in terms of the Full Bench judgment in Tulsiwadi (supra). Consequently, the judgment and order of learned Single Judge dated 15.04.2011 was set aside and quashed. It was made clear that the Division Bench had not gone into the merit of the case and that all the points and contentions of the respective parties were expressly kept open to be agitated before the HPC.
1