Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.22 seconds)

Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma vs Navaratna Pharmaceutical ... on 20 October, 1964

17. As to what are the standards applicable to such actions claiming infringement is no longer open to debate; they have evolved and applied through a series of decisions of the Supreme Court and other High Courts in India, starting with the judgment reported as Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma v. Navratna Pharmaceutcal Laboratories, AIR 1965 SC 980; Corn Product Refinding Co. v. Shangrila Food Products Ltd., AIR 1960 SC 142; Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo Gupta, AIR 1963 SC 449 onwards.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 512 - N R Ayyangar - Full Document

Corn Products Refining Co. vs Shangrila Food Products Ltd. on 8 October, 1959

17. As to what are the standards applicable to such actions claiming infringement is no longer open to debate; they have evolved and applied through a series of decisions of the Supreme Court and other High Courts in India, starting with the judgment reported as Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma v. Navratna Pharmaceutcal Laboratories, AIR 1965 SC 980; Corn Product Refinding Co. v. Shangrila Food Products Ltd., AIR 1960 SC 142; Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo Gupta, AIR 1963 SC 449 onwards.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 398 - Full Document

Midas Hygiene Industries P. Ltd. And ... vs Sudhir Bhatia And Ors. on 22 January, 2004

21. On a consideration of all the above aspects, the Court is of the opinion that the plaintiff has established a prima facie case for grant of temporary injunctive relief sought for. According to the holding in Midas Hygiene (supra), once such a test is established in infringement actions, the Courts ordinarily should not withhold relief. In these circumstances, the applications for injunction are allowed. The defendant is hereby restrained from using the mark and word "VARDHMAN" in relation to their trade or corporate name or the services offered by it or on its behalf by anyone else, so as to indicate a linkage with the plaintiff's corporate name or trademark. IA 7674/2009 is allowed in the above terms, in this view no orders are called for in IA 6139/2008.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 411 - Full Document
1