Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (0.55 seconds)
Nikunj Kumar Lohia & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal And Anr on 6 March, 2020 cites

Y. Abraham Ajith & Ors vs Inspector Of Police, Chennai & Anr on 17 August, 2004

Learned Counsel for the petitioners has also contended that from the allegations contained in the FIR, it transpires that the alleged offence was committed outside the territorial jurisdiction of Learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and such Learned Magistrate had no territorial jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offence in terms of Section 177 Cr.P.C. In support of his contention, he has placed his reliance on the decision of Y.Abraham Ajith & Ors. Vs. Inspector of Police, Chennai & Anr. reported in (2004) 8 SCC 100. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has specifically contended that the allegations made in the First Information Report did not get support from the materials collected by the investigating agency during investigation. He has contended that during investigation only Form No.23AC of profit and loss account and Form No.20B of 2009 were seized by the investigating agency. It has been forcefully contended that the contents of the FIR and the materials collected during investigation did not disclose commission of any cognizable offence against the petitioners and continuance of the criminal proceedings against them would be an abuse of the process of the Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 438 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next