Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.47 seconds)

Hussainara Khatoon & Ors vs Home Secretary, State Of Bihar, Govt. Of ... on 12 February, 1979

11. Fair and proper investigation is the primary duty of the State. No investigating agency can take unduly long time in completing investigation. Under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, speedy trial is a fundamental right which in turn encompasses speedy investigation, inquiry, appeal, revision and retrial. Reference in this regard is invited to Judgments-Dilawar vs. State of Haryana, (2018) 16 SCC 521; Menka Gandhi vs. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597; Hussainara Khatoon (I) vs. State of Bihar, (1980) 1 SCC 81; Abdul Rehman Antulay vs. R.S. Nayak, (1992) 1 SCC 225; and P. Ramchandra Rao vs. State of Karnataka, (2002) 4 SCC 578.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 992 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Abdul Rehman Antulay & Ors vs R.S. Nayak & Anr on 10 December, 1991

11. Fair and proper investigation is the primary duty of the State. No investigating agency can take unduly long time in completing investigation. Under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, speedy trial is a fundamental right which in turn encompasses speedy investigation, inquiry, appeal, revision and retrial. Reference in this regard is invited to Judgments-Dilawar vs. State of Haryana, (2018) 16 SCC 521; Menka Gandhi vs. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597; Hussainara Khatoon (I) vs. State of Bihar, (1980) 1 SCC 81; Abdul Rehman Antulay vs. R.S. Nayak, (1992) 1 SCC 225; and P. Ramchandra Rao vs. State of Karnataka, (2002) 4 SCC 578.
Supreme Court of India Cites 58 - Cited by 715 - B P Reddy - Full Document

P. Ramachandra Rao, Etc. ... vs State Of Karnataka Respondent on 16 April, 2002

11. Fair and proper investigation is the primary duty of the State. No investigating agency can take unduly long time in completing investigation. Under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, speedy trial is a fundamental right which in turn encompasses speedy investigation, inquiry, appeal, revision and retrial. Reference in this regard is invited to Judgments-Dilawar vs. State of Haryana, (2018) 16 SCC 521; Menka Gandhi vs. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597; Hussainara Khatoon (I) vs. State of Bihar, (1980) 1 SCC 81; Abdul Rehman Antulay vs. R.S. Nayak, (1992) 1 SCC 225; and P. Ramchandra Rao vs. State of Karnataka, (2002) 4 SCC 578.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 224 - D Raju - Full Document
1   2 Next