Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.31 seconds)
Sandhya vs Thrivedi Babu on 19 May, 2025 cites

A.Gopinathan vs Afzal Basha on 9 March, 2020

In Gopinathan A. and Others v. Afzal Basha and Another [2020 (3) KHC 666], this Court held that the notional monthly income to be considered for a housewife/homemaker who met with a motor accident in the year 2004, for the purpose of awarding just and reasonable compensation under the head of 'loss of dependency', shall not be less than Rs. 4,500/-. This figure is equivalent to the notional income that could be taken for a manual labourer or a worker in the unorganised sector, such as a vegetable or fruit vendor, who met with a motor accident in the same year, taking into account the notional income fixed by the Apex Court in Ramachandrappa v.
Kerala High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 5 - A Narendran - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi And Others on 22 June, 2022

13. The appellant was aged 36 years at MACA Nos.1505/2016 : 12 : 2025:KER:34102 the time of accident and as per the principles laid down in National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi and Ors. [2017 (4) KLT 662], the multiplier to be adopted is '15' and not '16' as taken by the Tribunal. Accordingly, the compensation for permanent disability is re-fixed as Rs. 2,43,000/- (4500×12×15×30/100). Since the appellant has already been paid an amount of Rs. 2,01,600/-, she is entitled for an enhanced amount of Rs.41,400/- under the said head.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1946 - J R Dua - Full Document
1