Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.20 seconds)

Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai vs State Of Gujarat on 18 November, 2002

In the case of Sundarbhai Ambala Desai vs. State of Gujarat, [(2002) 10 SCC 283], the Apex Court has held that "it is of no use to keep such seized vehicles at the police stations for a long period. It is for the Magistrate to pass appropriate orders immediately by taking appropriate bond and guarantee as well as security for return of the said vehicles, if 3 required at any point of time."
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 21090 - Full Document

Rajendra Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh& Others on 8 August, 1996

In support of his contentions, learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance upon the case law of Raj Kumar Sahu vs. State of M.P., [2019 (2) MPLJ 438] and decision of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Rajendra Singh vs. State of M.P. passed on 03/8/2021 in WP No. 8615 of 2020 as well as order dated 31/8/2021 passed by this Court in MCRC No. 43109 of 2021 (Manoj Kumar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh) and prayed that the seized Dumper may be released to the petitioner on supurdignama during pendency of trial.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 929 - B P Reddy - Full Document

Raj Kumar Sahu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 4 November, 2015

In support of his contentions, learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance upon the case law of Raj Kumar Sahu vs. State of M.P., [2019 (2) MPLJ 438] and decision of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Rajendra Singh vs. State of M.P. passed on 03/8/2021 in WP No. 8615 of 2020 as well as order dated 31/8/2021 passed by this Court in MCRC No. 43109 of 2021 (Manoj Kumar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh) and prayed that the seized Dumper may be released to the petitioner on supurdignama during pendency of trial.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

Chandra Shekhar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 August, 2021

In support of his contentions, learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance upon the case law of Raj Kumar Sahu vs. State of M.P., [2019 (2) MPLJ 438] and decision of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Rajendra Singh vs. State of M.P. passed on 03/8/2021 in WP No. 8615 of 2020 as well as order dated 31/8/2021 passed by this Court in MCRC No. 43109 of 2021 (Manoj Kumar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh) and prayed that the seized Dumper may be released to the petitioner on supurdignama during pendency of trial.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 750 - V Mishra - Full Document
1