Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.19 seconds)Md. Allauddin Khan vs The State Of Bihar on 15 April, 2019
In a recent judgment passed on 15.04.2019 in Criminal Appeal No.675 of 2019 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.1151 of 2018, Mohd. Allauddin Khan v. State of Bihar and others, 2019 (6) SCC 107, the Apex Court has held that the High Court had no jurisdiction to appreciate the evidences of the proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. because where there are contradictions or the inconsistencies in the statements of the witnesses, is essentially an issue relating to appreciation of evidences and the same can be gone into by the Judicial Magistrate during trial, when the entire evidence is adduced by the parties. The same view has also been reiterated in judgment dated 31.07.2019 passed by Apex Court in Criminal Appeal No.1082 of 2019, arising out of SLP (Crl.)
Chilakamarthi Venkateswarlu And ... vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh And Another on 30 August, 2018
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 239 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 320 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012
In the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, Hon'ble Supreme Court has made the following observation in Paragraph 61 which is quoted herein below :-
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
1