Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 31 (0.33 seconds)
Kirtikumar vs Dilipkumar
cites
Section 69 in The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 [Entire Act]
Section 44 in The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 [Entire Act]
The Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Section 8 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration Act, 1940
Section 9 in The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 [Entire Act]
Prabhu Shankar Jaiswal vs Sri Sheo Narain Jaiswal & Ors on 29 October, 1996
8.2 I
have considered the rival submissions made by the learned senior
Advocates for the parties. It is the fact that the judgment of
Prabhushankar Jaiswal (supra) as
well as Prem Lata (smt) (supra) are not in the case of a partnersip
at will and whether the firm is a partnership at will or not the said
issue was not before the Supreme Court when they have delivered
the above referred two judgments i.e. Prabhushankar Jaiswal
(supra) as well as Prem
Lata (smt) (supra).