Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.28 seconds)

Kalka Inst. For Rese. And Advance ... vs Hitesh Kumar And Ors. on 1 February, 2006

9. Learned counsel for the Appellant has relied on Kalka Institute for Rese. and Advance Studies Vs. Hitesh Kumar (Supra), wherein it has been held that since petitioner attended classes for about one month and he applied for withdrawal much after 16.08.2020, the fee was not refundable. It was mentioned in the information bulletin that if a student applies for withdrawal of admission on or before 16.08.2020, the total fee will be refundable after deducting 20%, but where an application for withdrawal of admission is made after 16.08.2000, no refund of fees except security deposit will be made.
Delhi High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 8 - M Katju - Full Document

Fiitjee Ltd. vs Harish Soni on 8 October, 2015

15. We find that respondent has not given any reasonable justification or shown any cogent evidence in support of the contention that his son left the coaching after the end of first year, as coaching given by the appellant institute was not upto the mark. Further, ALLOWED Page 11 of 13 FA/468/2014 FIITJEE LTD. VS PRADEEP KUMAR. DOD : 17.02.2023 respondent and his son have signed the enrollment form alongwith the declaration/terms and conditions, which includes the clause, the fees once paid is not refundable at all, whatever the reasons be. The appellant has also stated that to ensure quality education and uniform teaching standard and thereby, keeping in mind the students interest it does not fill the vacancy created against any student who leaves the course midway. This matter is similar to the case relied by the counsel for the appellant in the case titled as "FIITJEE Ltd. Vs. Harish Soni", decided on 08.10.2015 of Hon'ble NCDRC in RP No. 2054 of 2013 wherein it has been held that the complainant is not entitled to refund of the fee for the remaining period of one year.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 12 - Cited by 19 - Full Document
1