Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.27 seconds)Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 26 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 145 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Kartar Singh & Others vs The State Of Punjab on 26 April, 1956
This he did relying on a decision of this Court in Allah Dia v. State, 1959 All LJ 340 and also on two other decisions Bodhan v. Emperor, 1948-49 Cri LJ 486=(AIR 1948 All 223) and Emperor v. Bhagi, 1641-42 Cri LJ 539=(AIR 1941 Oudh 359) For the admissiblllty of a first information report of a confessional nature after exclusion of the confessional part he also relied upon Kartar Singh v. State, 1952 Cri LJ 1090= (AIR 1952 Pep 98) and State v. Balchand, 1960 Cr LJ 520=(AIR 1960 Raj 101) and State of Rajasthan v. Shiv Singh. AIR 1962 Raj 3.
Section 157 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Aghnoo Nagesia vs State Of Bihar on 4 May, 1965
In Aghnoo Nagesia's case, AIR 1966 SC 119 (supra) Bachawat. J. himself observed:
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Bodhan And Ors. vs Emperor on 15 October, 1947
This he did relying on a decision of this Court in Allah Dia v. State, 1959 All LJ 340 and also on two other decisions Bodhan v. Emperor, 1948-49 Cri LJ 486=(AIR 1948 All 223) and Emperor v. Bhagi, 1641-42 Cri LJ 539=(AIR 1941 Oudh 359) For the admissiblllty of a first information report of a confessional nature after exclusion of the confessional part he also relied upon Kartar Singh v. State, 1952 Cri LJ 1090= (AIR 1952 Pep 98) and State v. Balchand, 1960 Cr LJ 520=(AIR 1960 Raj 101) and State of Rajasthan v. Shiv Singh. AIR 1962 Raj 3.