Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.26 seconds)
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. ... vs Indira Bai And Ors. on 4 October, 2006 cites

New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs Diwakar S/O Daulatrao Rohankar And Ors. on 16 June, 2005

3. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties. Mr. Rajesh Pandey, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant insurance company placing strong reliance on the judgment of the High Court of Bombay in the case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Diwakar , would contend that the M.A.C.T. having held rightly that the insurance company is under no legal obligation to pay compensation on the ground that there was breach of conditions of policy on the part of the owner of the motor vehicle involved in the accident, seriously erred in law in directing the insurance company to pay a compensation in the first instance to the claimants and then to recover the same from the owner of the motor vehicle.
Bombay High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 8 - S T Kharche - Full Document

M/S. National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Baljit Kaur And Ors on 6 January, 2004

4. Per contra, learned Counsel appearing for the claimants, placing reliance on judgments of the Apex Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Baljit Kaur ; National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Challa Bharathamma ; Pramod Kumar Agrawal v. Mushtari Begum and National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bommithi Subbhayamma , would submit that the direction issued by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal to the appellant insurance company to pay the compensation in the first instance and to recover the same from the owner is unexceptionable and is in accordance with the settled position in law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 713 - V N Khare - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Chella Bharathamma & Ors on 21 September, 2004

4. Per contra, learned Counsel appearing for the claimants, placing reliance on judgments of the Apex Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Baljit Kaur ; National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Challa Bharathamma ; Pramod Kumar Agrawal v. Mushtari Begum and National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bommithi Subbhayamma , would submit that the direction issued by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal to the appellant insurance company to pay the compensation in the first instance and to recover the same from the owner is unexceptionable and is in accordance with the settled position in law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 623 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Sri Pramod Kumar Agrawal And Anr vs Smt. Mushtari Begum And Ors on 18 August, 2004

4. Per contra, learned Counsel appearing for the claimants, placing reliance on judgments of the Apex Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Baljit Kaur ; National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Challa Bharathamma ; Pramod Kumar Agrawal v. Mushtari Begum and National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bommithi Subbhayamma , would submit that the direction issued by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal to the appellant insurance company to pay the compensation in the first instance and to recover the same from the owner is unexceptionable and is in accordance with the settled position in law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 117 - A Pasayat - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Bommithi Subbhayamma And Ors. on 21 February, 2005

4. Per contra, learned Counsel appearing for the claimants, placing reliance on judgments of the Apex Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Baljit Kaur ; National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Challa Bharathamma ; Pramod Kumar Agrawal v. Mushtari Begum and National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bommithi Subbhayamma , would submit that the direction issued by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal to the appellant insurance company to pay the compensation in the first instance and to recover the same from the owner is unexceptionable and is in accordance with the settled position in law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 230 - Full Document
1