Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)J.K.Mittal vs Central Information Commission And Anr on 28 October, 2013
6. The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing
both the parties and perusal of records, observes that the complaint sought information
related to the promotions of Scale IV to Scale V which was held in the years 2015 to
2018. Perusal of the record further reveals that the CPIO had given point-wise
reply/information vide their letters dated 05.05.2018 and 29.08.2018. Besides, the
respondent during the course of hearing submitted that year-wise number of empanelled
candidates, waitlist candidates and selected candidates for the years 2015 to 2017 was
available in HRMS which could be accessed by every employee. There appears to be no
mala fide on the part of the respondent in responding to the RTI application. The Hon'ble
High Court of Delhi in its judgment dated 28.10.2013 J.K. Mittal vs. Central Information
Commission and Anr. [W.P.(C) No. 6755/2012] observed as under:
Section 18 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
1