Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 319 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Ravindranatha Bajpe vs Mangalore Special Economic Zone Ltd. ... on 27 September, 2021
This legal position is explicitly laid down by the Apex Court in a
plethora of decisions, including Ravindranatha Bajpe
(supra).
Priyanka Srivastava & Anr vs State Of U.P.& Ors on 19 March, 2015
12. The challenge in Crl.M.C.Nos.875 of 2024 and 2898 of
2023 is against further proceedings against C.C.No.480 of 2017
which originated from a private complaint. Apart from the
grounds discussed above, learned counsel for the petitioners
have raised an additional contention that the complaint was not
accompanied by an affidavit, which became mandatory after the
declaration of law in that regard by the Apex Court in Priyanka
Srivastava (supra).
Sharad Kumar Sanghi vs Sangita Rane on 10 February, 2015
In
support of the contention, reliance is placed on the decision of
the Apex Court in Sharad Kumar Sanghi v. Sangita Rane
[(2015) 12 SCC 781]. Referring to Annexure P8 order in
Crl.M.C.No.3255 of 2024, it is pointed out that in the order
granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners in Crime No.238 of
2015 of Maradu Police Station learned Sessions Judge had
taken note of the fact that, in the claim for Rs.76,55,775/-
raised by the de facto complainant, attachment of the
properties of the Developer had been ordered and the same is
under challenge before the High Court.
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1