Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.47 seconds)
Shri Ganpati Developers, Kota vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax , ... on 30 March, 2021 cites

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Anil Bhalla on 8 January, 2020

ITAT Hyderabad 'B' Bench in the case of DCIT vs M. Aja Babu in ITA No. 1755, 1756 86 1757/HYD/2012 dated 23.04.2014 following the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of CIT vs Anil Bhalla (322 ITR 191 (Del), CIT vs Dinesh Jain WWI 211 Taxman 23 (Del) and CIT vs Jaipal Aggarwal 212 Taxman 1 (Del), ITAT Mumbai in the case of ACIT vs. JP Morgan India Pvt. Ltd. 46 SOT 250(Mumbai) has held that the addition made by the AO based on the loose paper, which is not a conclusive evidence and therefore, the same is not sufficient for making the addition.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 19 - Full Document

Dcit, Jaipur vs Ram Babu Gupta, Jaipur on 28 March, 2017

ITAT Hyderabad 'B' Bench in the case of DCIT vs M. Aja Babu in ITA No. 1755, 1756 86 1757/HYD/2012 dated 23.04.2014 following the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of CIT vs Anil Bhalla (322 ITR 191 (Del), CIT vs Dinesh Jain WWI 211 Taxman 23 (Del) and CIT vs Jaipal Aggarwal 212 Taxman 1 (Del), ITAT Mumbai in the case of ACIT vs. JP Morgan India Pvt. Ltd. 46 SOT 250(Mumbai) has held that the addition made by the AO based on the loose paper, which is not a conclusive evidence and therefore, the same is not sufficient for making the addition.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 9 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

M/S. Morgan Securities & Credits Pvt. ... vs Acit, New Delhi on 4 March, 2016

ITAT Hyderabad 'B' Bench in the case of DCIT vs M. Aja Babu in ITA No. 1755, 1756 86 1757/HYD/2012 dated 23.04.2014 following the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of CIT vs Anil Bhalla (322 ITR 191 (Del), CIT vs Dinesh Jain WWI 211 Taxman 23 (Del) and CIT vs Jaipal Aggarwal 212 Taxman 1 (Del), ITAT Mumbai in the case of ACIT vs. JP Morgan India Pvt. Ltd. 46 SOT 250(Mumbai) has held that the addition made by the AO based on the loose paper, which is not a conclusive evidence and therefore, the same is not sufficient for making the addition.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 0 - Cited by 23 - Full Document

Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag & ... vs Mst. Katiji & Ors on 19 February, 1987

13. If we apply the settled principles as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as other courts on the facts of the present case, we find that the assessee has explained cause of delay, therefore, in the facts and circumstances of the case, we condone the delay of 06 days in filing the present C.O. and admit the same for hearing and adjudication.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 5846 - M P Thakkar - Full Document
1   2 Next