Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.21 seconds)Section 212 in Government of India Act, 1935 [Entire Act]
Section 205 in Government of India Act, 1935 [Entire Act]
Section 208 in Government of India Act, 1935 [Entire Act]
The High Commissioner For India And The ... vs I.M. Lall on 18 March, 1948
5. The Privy Council in -- 'High Commr. for India & Pakistan v. I.M. Lair quote with approval a passage from the judgment of the learned Chief Justice to the following effect (p. 126):
Article 141 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Province Of Punjab vs Pandit Tara Chand on 11 April, 1947
It is unfortunate that the attention of the Privy Council was not directed to 'Tara Chand's case, (B)' and we do not find any discussion of 'Tara Chand's case, (B)', in the judgment of the Privy Council.
Shri Om Prakash Gupta vs The United Provinces on 6 November, 1950
The same view of the law has been taken by the Allahabad High Court in -- 'Om Prakash v. United Provinces', .
Province Of Bombay vs Madhukar Ganpat Nerlekar on 20 December, 1950
16. As far as our own High Court is concerned, in -- 'Province of Bombay v. Madhukar Ganpat', AIR 1932 Bom 37 (E), a division bench of this Court consisting of Mr. Justice Rajadhyaksha and Mr. Justice Vyas took the view that the only relief to which the plaintiff, who was a dismissed servant in that case, was entitled was a declaration as given by the Privy Council.
Abdul Majid vs Province Of Bihar on 5 May, 1949
15. Mr. Vakharia has relied on a decision of the Patna High Court in -- 'Abdul Majid v. Province of Bihar', .
1