Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)
Mrs. Minal Rohit Shah And Anr vs New Sagar Darshan Co-Op. Hous. Soc. Ltd. ... on 26 August, 2021
cites
Section 138 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Tukaram Anant Joshi, A Lunatic By His ... vs Vithal Joshi And Ors. on 14 January, 1889
In Sri Ramachandra and Anr. vs. Sri Vithal & Ors. 2009 (9) Kar
pps 6 of 16
1 WP 443 of 2020 (J).doc
LJ 110, the Circuit Bench of Karnataka High Court while considering
the object and scheme of cross-examination has held thus:
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Piroja Ghadiali vs Pestonji Ghadiali on 16 July, 1942
In Piroja Ghadiali vs. Pestonji Ghadiali 1946 (48) Bom.L.R. 36 a
suit for divorce was filed by the husband on the ground of adultery
by the wife with the co-defendant. After the cross-examination of
the Defendant wife by the Plaintiff and re-examination, the co-
defendant sought leave to cross-examine the Defendant wife. This
Court had observed that:
Sri Mohamed Ziaulla vs Mrs. Sorgra Begum And Anr. on 31 January, 1997
7. A similar question was raised before the Honourable Karnataka
High Court in Sri Mohamed Ziaulla vs. Mrs. Sorgra Begum & Anr.
1997 SCC Online KR 17. It has been held thus:
1