Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.19 seconds)Subbayya vs Saminadayyar on 16 January, 1895
43. If the Madras case, Subbayya v. Saminadayyar (1895) 18 Mad.
Oula And Ors. vs Beepathee And Anr. on 18 September, 1893
62. From this statement of facts, which appear from the roznama, it is clear that the Court was right in acting under Section 365 of the Code in entering Balabai's name on the record. Whatever error it had committed in the beginning was waived by the defendant's conduct, and the act of the Court stood complete so as to fall proparly within the requirements of that section. "When there is no dispute as to the applicant being the legal representative, the procedure prescribed by Section 365 is to be followed" Muttuswami Ayyar, J., in Oula v. Beepathee . That procedure was substantially followed here. Having acted under that section, the Court was bound under it to proceed with the suit.
1