Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.16 seconds)

Smt. K L Susheela vs Ksrtc on 1 December, 2020

3. Heard. The counsel for the respondents submitted that the judgment relied on by the petitioners has been challenged before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and Special Leave Petitions are pending and that the Apex Court has granted interim stay only in some of the Special Leave Petitions that too against further proceedings in contempt of Court cases. The petitioners also rely on Ext.P16 judgment of this Court in WP(C) No.22061/2019, wherein , this Court had directed the 2nd respondent to take into account the provisional service also for the purpose of pension. Considering the above aspects, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2 nd respondent to take into account the provisional service prior to the regular service WP(C).No.11010 OF 2021(A) 4 while calculating the pension payable to the petitioners. It is made clear that the above direction will be subject to the result of the Special Leave Petitions filed by the respondents against the judgment in K.L.Francis (supra). Necessary orders shall be passed within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 12 - N Rangaswamy - Full Document
1