Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.29 seconds)

V.S. Achuthanandhan vs P.J. Francis And Anr on 22 March, 1999

43. The Judgment relied on by the learned Counsel for the respondent No.1/Election Petitioner in V.Achuthanandan Vs. P.J.Francis and another (supra 6) not apply to the facts of the case, as the facts in the said case pertaining to the recounting of votes and facts in the instant case is with regard to Non-disclosure of assets, Non-disclosure of income, misrepresentation about the educational qualifications and SK,J 39 I.A.No.2 of 2025 in E.P.No.16 of 2024 misrepresentation about loans and dues to the Banks by the petitioner/respondent No.1.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 134 - Full Document

P.V. Guru Raj Reddy & Anr vs P. Neeradha Reddy & Ors on 13 February, 2015

44. Another Judgment relied on by the learned Counsel for the respondent No.1/Election Petitioner is in P.V.Guru Raj Reddy Vs. P.neeradha Reddy (supra 7), and this Court while disposing of the instant interlocutory application has taken into averments made in the Election Petition and the documents filed by the Election Petitioner by following the said Judgment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 167 - R Gogoi - Full Document

Dahiben vs Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (Gajra) ... on 9 July, 2020

In another Judgment, while dealing with the maintainability of application under Order-VII, Rule-11 CPC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Dahiben Vs. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanus Ali (Gajra) Dead, through LRs and others,9, it was held that powers under Order-7, Rule-11 CPC may be exercised by the Court at any stage of the suit. The relevant portion of the said Judgment is extracted as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 390 - I Malhotra - Full Document
1   2 Next