Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)Section 115 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Requisitioning And Acquisition Of Immovable Property Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
The Requisitioning And Acquisition Of Immovable Property Act, 1952
The Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Shankar Ramchandra Abhyankar vs Krishnaji Dattatreya Bapat on 16 April, 1969
5. A somewhat similar issue arose before the Supreme Court in Shankar Ramchandra Abhayankar v. Krishnaji Dattatraya Bapat, . The owner initiated eviction proceedings under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (the Act is short) against the tenant. The trial Court granted a decree for two rooms out of four rooms occupied by the tenant. Both sides filed appeals and they were dismissed by the District Judge. Thereupon tenant preferred revision before the High Court Under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code and the same was dismissed. After dismissal of revision petition, he again moved the High Court under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the same order of appellate Court. The Division Bench held that in spite of the dismissal of Revision Petition by the single Judge, there could be interference under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. On appeal by Special Leave, the Supreme Court observed:
1