Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.39 seconds)
Kedia Distilleries Ltd. vs Chhattisgarh Chemical Mill Mazdoor ... on 18 February, 2000 cites

Neo Sacks Limited vs Cegat on 28 January, 1998

4. The answer to the question framed, before us will depend upon if the view taken in the two cases-Neo Sacks Limited (supra) and Kedia Distilleries Limited (supra) is correct in holding that all the Tribunals constituted under Article 323A or under Article 323B of the Constitution are subjected to jurisdiction of a Division Bench of a High Court in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Ors., reported in AIR 1997 SC 1125 : 1997 (3) SCC 261 : 1995-II-LLJ-640.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

L. Chandra Kumar vs Union Of India And Others on 18 March, 1997

4. The answer to the question framed, before us will depend upon if the view taken in the two cases-Neo Sacks Limited (supra) and Kedia Distilleries Limited (supra) is correct in holding that all the Tribunals constituted under Article 323A or under Article 323B of the Constitution are subjected to jurisdiction of a Division Bench of a High Court in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Ors., reported in AIR 1997 SC 1125 : 1997 (3) SCC 261 : 1995-II-LLJ-640.
Supreme Court of India Cites 86 - Cited by 2564 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document
1   2 Next