Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.33 seconds)

Accused X vs The State Of Maharashtra on 12 April, 2019

9. CW.1 herself states sexual act between her and the petitioner was on the inducement of the marriage. The fact of inducement and falsity of promise of the marriage are required to be proved on trial. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in X v. State of Telangana's case, Dr.Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar's case and Crl.P.No.1488/2020 7 Pramod Suryabhan Pawar's case referred to supra in similar circumstances, observed that the circumstances do bear upon the defence that there was a consensual relationship between the petitioner and accused.
Supreme Court of India Cites 50 - Cited by 58 - N V Ramana - Full Document
1   2 Next