Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.21 seconds)Section 9 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Tarun Prasad Chatterjee vs Dinanath Sharma on 10 October, 2000
12. The learned Counsel for the petitioner relied on the
decisions in Tarun Prasad Chatterjee and Shasikala's cases to
2025:KER:11881
W.P (C) No.403 of 2025
8
support her assertion that the 1st petitioner will continue to be
considered as a person of 50 years old until the preceding day of
her 51st birthday. It is pertinent to note that Tarun Prasad's case
dealt with the interpretation of Section 9 of the General Clauses
Act, 1897, in relation to the computation of the limitation period
under Section 81(1) of the Representation of People Act, 1951,
which has no relevance to the present case.
Section 4 in The Indian Majority Act, 1875 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Jaison M.K vs George on 5 February, 2015
In Jaison V. George's case, this Court addressed the
question of whether a person would attain 18 years of age only
on the previous midnight of his 19 th birthday in a matter arising
under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act,
2015. This Court concluded that a person would attain 18 years
on the day preceding his 18th birthday anniversary.
Prabhu Dayal Sesma vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 28 August, 1986
15. The Honourable Supreme Court has followed the view
in Prabhu Dayal Sesma's case in Earati Laxman v. State of
Andhra Pradesh [2009 (3) SCC 337] while interpreting the
provisions of the Majority Act and has reiterated that a person
attains a particular age at midnight on the day preceding his
birthday anniversary.