Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.35 seconds)Section 16 in The Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 [Entire Act]
M/S. Sri Vignesh Yarns Pvt. Ltd vs S.Subramaniam on 16 November, 2012
7. Keeping the above dictum laid down by the Division Bench of this Court,
this Court is of the view that when the alignment was made by the experts taking
into consideration various factors and even if there is a slight change in the
positioning of tower in the alignment route it will then have chain reaction,
and hence this Court cannot direct the respondents to shift the High Tension
Transmission line. Further,
R.SUBBIAH,J
sj
this Court cannot entertain the prayer, since public interest is involved in
this matter. Hence, the Writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
C.Ram Prakash vs Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd on 23 August, 2011
In support of his contention, the learned counsel appearing for the
respondents 2 and 3 relied on the unreported judgment of the Division Bench of
this Court in W.A.(MD) No.602 of 2011 dated 23.08.2011 between C. Ram Prakash
and another v. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., and another, wherein it has
been held that the Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., has got power under
Sections 10 and 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1985 and such a power has been
conferred upon it in public interest and considering the object behind the
Indian Telegraph Act and the Electricity Act, 2003, and in view of the power
available under Section 10 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1985, the Power Grid
Corporation of India Ltd has got every jurisdiction to erect the towers.
Section 17 in The Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 [Entire Act]
The Electricity Act, 2003
1