Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.28 seconds)
Deptt Of Posts vs Purshotam Dass Sharma on 17 November, 2025 cites

State Of U.P.& Ors vs Arvind Kumar Srivastava & Ors on 17 October, 2014

vii) The order of the Tribunal dated 16.12.2024 is required to be reviewed in terms of the decision of the Tribunal in State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. V. Arvind Kumar Srivastava & Ors., Civil Appeal No.9849 of 2014, for extending the benefit to the similarly placed persons, which is erroneous and based on obiter dicta and ignored the ratio decided of the case. As the Hon'ble Supreme Court has denied to provide relief to similarly situated persons on the ground of delay and latches.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 1005 - A K Sikri - Full Document

Direct Recruit Class Ii Engineering ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 2 May, 1990

iii) The Tribunal has not taken into consideration the fact that when the matter had already been adjudicated upon by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and has been conclusively decided, raising the same question again before the Tribunal was barred by the principle of res judicata in terms of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Direct Recruit Class-II Engineering Officers Association v. State of Maharashtra, [(1990) 2 SCC 715].
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 915 - L M Sharma - Full Document

Dhanraj vs Vikram Singh on 10 May, 2023

iv) The Tribunal after taking note of the RTP Scheme, as contained in para-3 of the impugned order, has not found anything unconstitutional. The right of all the persons governed by the scheme shall be strictly as per the provisions of the scheme and cannot be changed in any way by this Tribunal in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dhanraj v. Vikram Singh & Ors., Civil Appeal No.3117/2009 decided on 10.05.2023.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Naresh Kumar Beri & Ors. vs Union Of India & Ors. on 31 October, 2022

8. It is also found that on behalf of the applicant, reliance was placed on the order/judgment dated 18.09.2024 of this Tribunal in OA No. 197/2020 titled Naresh Kumar & Ors. vs Union of India & Ors. and as evidently recorded in paragraph 9 of the impugned order, the learned counsel for the respondents had not disputed that the issue involved in the present case is identical to that in OA No. 197/2020 (supra).
Delhi High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 3 - Y Varma - Full Document

Sangeeta Kaushik Alias Satya Bhama vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 17 November, 2009

i) the order of the Tribunal dated 16.12.2024 in the aforesaid OA as well as OA No.197/2020 is Digitally signed NEHA by NEHA SHARMA SHARMADate: 2025.11.28 10:43:34+05'30' 8 RA No. 177/2025 in OA No. 4477/2024 erroneous inasmuch as the order under review has not taken into consideration the provisions of the RTP Scheme issued by the review applicants and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jagrit Mazdoor Union (Regd.) & Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. & Anr. Etc. Etc., [1989 SCR Supp.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1