Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.78 seconds)
Palvadi Lokeswara Venkata Varaprasad vs Transmission Corporation Of Ap Ltd on 1 September, 2025
cites
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Thomas Daniel vs State Of Kerala . on 2 May, 2022
11. Thus placing reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court
in the case of Thomas Daniel Vs. State Of Kerala and others and decision
of the Gauhati High Court in the case of Virendra Dutt Gyani (referred
supra), affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court, Writ Petition Nos.41889, 16062,
16067, 18472, 24745, 27897 & 27933 of 2022 are disposed of with the
following directions:
State Of Punjab & Ors vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer) on 18 December, 2014
"(13) In State of Punjab and Others v. Rafiq Masih (White Washer)
and Others wherein this court examined the validity of an order passed by
the State to recover the monetary gains wrongly extended to the beneficiary
employees in excess of their entitlements without any fault or
misrepresentation at the behest of the recipient. This Court considered
situations of hardship caused to an employee, if recovery is directed to
reimburse the employer and disallowed the same, exempting the beneficiary
employees from such recovery. It was held thus:
State Of H.P & Ors vs Rajesh Chander Sood Etc Etc on 28 September, 2016
7. The learned Standing Counsel Sri V.V.Satish, appearing for the
respondents would argue that Corporation does not have separate pension
Rules and it has adopted the Pension Rules of the State government.
Therefore, the same have been followed as modified and amended. He
relying on the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court decision in the case of State
of Himachal Pradesh and Others Vs. Rajesh Chander Sood and others,2
argues that it is well within the authority of the state Government in exercise of
its administrative powers to fix a cutoff date for continuing the right to receive
pension in some and depriving the same to others.
Gian Dutt Pandey @ Gyan Dutt Pandey vs Union Of India Nad Another on 31 October, 2019
I. Placing reliance on the decision of the Gauhati High Court
in the case of Virendra Dutt Gyani's case (referred
supra), affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court, it is observed
that the petitioners are entitled for payment of Additional
Quantum of Pension from the first day of 70th year.
1