Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)
Waman S/O Lobhaji Dhakate vs Schedule Tribe Caste Cert. Scrutiny ... on 15 December, 2016 cites

Madhukar Vishwanath Sonawane vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 6 November, 2001

Shri Joshi, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1-Scrutiny Committee, does not dispute the position of law as laid down by the Full Bench. The learned Assistant Government Pleader fairly admitted that the petitioner was appointed before the cut off date that is 28.11.2000 and there is no adverse observation against ::: Uploaded on - 21/12/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 22/12/2016 00:15:54 ::: WP 6704.16.[J].odt 3 the petitioner in the order of the Scrutiny Committee, except that the caste claim of the petitioner is invalidated. The learned Assistant Government Pleader fairly admitted that a finding of fraud is not recorded against the petitioner in the order of the Scrutiny Committee.
Bombay High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 143 - R K Batta - Full Document

Vithal Ziblaji Sonone vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Police ... on 15 January, 2008

In the case of Arun Sonone .vs. State of Maharashtra, protection of services can be granted on fulfillment of 3 conditions viz. i) that upon verification by Scrutiny Committee, the caste certificate produced to secure appointment is not found to be false and fraudulent, ii) that appointee shall not take any advantage in terms of promotion or otherwise after 28.11.2000 solely on the basis of his claim as a candidate belonging to any of the Backward Class Category, iii) it shall be permissible for competent authority to withdraw the benefit or promotion obtained after 28.11.2000.
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 32 - K J Rohee - Full Document
1