Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.44 seconds)
Manganese Ore (India) Ltd. A vs The Regional Assistant Commissioner Of ... on 19 December, 1975
cites
Section 5 in The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Khemka & Co. (Agencies) Pvt. Ltd. vs State Of Maharashtra on 27 February, 1975
Learned counsel for the appellant placed great reliance
on a judgment of the Bombay High Court, a certified copy of
which has been filed in this Court in the Central Provinces
Manganese ore Company Ltd. v. The State of Maharashtra(1).
In the first place this judgment is not at all applicable to
the facts of the present case, because the Bombay High Court
was not dealing with a sale under the Central Sales Tax Act.
The High Court was pre-eminently concerned with the
provisions of the C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 and
there is nothing to show that the provisions of that Act
were in pari materia to the provisions of the Central Sales
Tax Act. More than this, we do not want to say about the
judgment of the Bombay High Court.
The Commissioner Of Sales-Tax,Eastern ... vs Husenali Adamji And Co on 21 April, 1959
Reliance was also placed by the appellant on a decision
of this Court in Commissioner of Sales Tax, Eastern
Division, Nagpur v. Husenali Adamji and Company & Another(2)
which also does not appear to be applicable to the facts of
the present case, because the Supreme Court in that case was
dealing with the question as to when the title in the goods
passes.
Mohd. Serajuddin Etc vs State Of Orissa on 16 April, 1975
In fact this position
was conceded by Mr. Natu appearing for the appellant but he
tried to persuade us to refer the case to a larger Bench for
reconsidering Md. Serajuddin's (supra) case.
The Central Universities Act, 2009
1