Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.27 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) ... vs Kabul Chawla on 29 March, 2016

7. That the Ld. AO as well as Ld. CIT(A), in respect of addition in para 5 and 6 (supra), ignored the judgement of jurisdictional Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT v Kabul Chawla [2016] 380 ITR 573 (Delhi) whereby it has held that completed assessments can be interfered with by the Ld. AO while making addition u/s 153A only on the basis of some incriminating material found during search.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 1159 - Full Document

Gwvalier I. J. Iyyappan & Another vs The Dharmodayam Company on 27 March, 1962

Law is well settled as held by the Supreme Court in Chevalier I Iyyappan v. Dharmodahyam Co. {AIR 1966 SC 1017}, that a party cannot change its stand and make a new case at appellate stage which was never raised earlier. For all these reasons, the additional grounds as well as the additional evidences being introduced in appeal are hereby rejected. Accordingly, the order of the ld. AO making an addition of Rs.75,24,990/- is not tinkered with."
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 16 - J L Kapur - Full Document
1   2 Next