Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.31 seconds)

Umashankar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 5 October, 2001

As regards the charged under Section 489B IPC and sentence of seven years rigorous imprisonment awarded against the appellant, learned advocate appearing for the appellant has relied on a decision in the case of Umashankar vs. State of Chhattisgarh reported in AIR 2001 SC 3074 to argue that there was no mens rea of the offence under Section 489B and 489C in view of the provision thereof on the 7 score that knowing or having reason to believe the currency notes or bank notes are forged or counterfeit. In the said cited decision it has been observed that the mens rea of selling, buying or receiving from another person or otherwise trafficking in or using as genuine forged or counterfeit currency notes or bank notes, is not enough to constitute offence under Section 489B of the IPC. So also possessing or even intending to use any forged or counterfeit currency notes or bank notes is not sufficient to make out a case under Section 489C in the absence of the mens rea. The observation of the Hon'ble Court was on a set of facts that on May 25, 1990 at about 10 p.m. the appellant having purchased one kilogram of mango of Rs.5, he paid fake currency note of Rs.100/- to P.W. 4 who doubted its genuineness. She showed to P.W. 2 and 7 who also said that it was a fake currency note. He was handed over to the police who recovered 13 more such fake currency notes from him. It was in that fact, charges were framed against him under Section 489A, 489B and 489C of the IPC. In that context, mens rea was not brought for using of the currency notes as it was a case of possession of fake notes. The facts scenario of the cited case is not well nigh within the facts and circumstances of the instant case as this Court finds that about 300 Indian fake notes were recovered from three accused persons including the appellant and 100 fake Indian currency notes were recovered from him which fact is well proved on evidence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 20 - Full Document
1