Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.49 seconds)
Sri Biswanath Pandey vs Dr. Toder Mal Tiwari on 13 May, 2013 cites

Yashoda Super Speciality Hospital vs Smt. A. Subbalakshmi & Anr. on 15 January, 2013

The Honble National Commission in a decision reported in 2013 (1) CPR 244 (NC) [Yashoda Super Speciality Hospital Vs. Smt. A. Subbalakshmi & Anr.] held that no patient can be treated in a casual manner. Evidently, in the instant case before pushing the ayurvedic injection the OPs did not undertake any investigation so as to make the proper diagnosis of the ailment suffered by the complainant. The expert in his opinion dated 10/03/10 specifically observed that Dr. Tiwari did not mention regarding search of cause of piles which would have revealed rectal mass or tumour. So the omission on the part of the OPs for conducting proper investigation clearly shows deficiency in service. It also speaks of negligence, in as much as, without proper diagnosis, the ayurvedic injection was administered in the anal canal of the complainant which is evident from the receipt granted by the OPs on 03/09/08. In Para-3 of the memo of appeal it has been contended that the respondents being Ayurvedic doctors, treated and prescribed allopathic medicines which was not permissible. On perusal of the papers on record we find that in the prescriptions dated 03/09/08 and 21/10/08 the OPs prescribed allopathic medicines.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Dr. R.R. Singh Avv (Bom) vs Pratibha P. Gamre on 14 May, 2012

On this point it has been held by the Honble National Commission in the case reported in 2012 (3) CPR 56 [Dr. R. R. Singh AVV (BOM) Vs. Pratibha P. Gamre] that Ayurvedic Practitioner cannot treat patient in allopathic stream. We are, therefore, of the considered view that the respondents being Ayurvedic doctors prescribed allopathic medicines which are not permissible.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 4 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1