Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.31 seconds)
State Nct Of Delhi vs Satya Narayan on 29 April, 2025 cites

State Of Maharashtra & Ors vs Sneha Satyanarayan Agrawal & Ors on 1 October, 2008

1. The present appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731 is directed against judgment dated 12th February, 2013, passed by the Special Judge-07 (Central), (PC Act), Delhi in C.C. No. 42/12, titled "State v. Satyanarayan". By the said order, the Special Judge has acquitted the Respondent for the offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.2 Factual Background
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 11 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

Neeraj Dutta vs State(Govt.Of N.C.T.Of Delhi) on 15 December, 2022

In Neeraj Dutta v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi),3 the Supreme Court observed that where the complainant is either deceased or otherwise unavailable to testify, the demand for illegal gratification may still be established through the testimony of other witnesses, either oral or documentary, or by relying on circumstantial evidence adduced by the prosecution. In the present case, the Trial Court has correctly noted in Paragraph Nos. 19 to 21 of the impugned order that the narrative of the Complaint was not corroborated by any other witness, and no circumstances were brought on record to permit reliance upon its contents under Section 32 or any other exception to the hearsay rule.
Supreme Court of India Cites 93 - Cited by 160 - B V Nagarathna - Full Document
1   2 Next