Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.22 seconds)Haw Par Bros. International Ltd. vs Tiger Balm Co. (P) Ltd. And Ors. on 1 April, 1995
Ch D and Tiger Balm case, 1995 ILR (2) Mad 209, cited by the plaintiff, relating to transborder reputation, which would afford sufficient basis for the grant of injunction. But even then the learned single Judge did not consider them in detail in order to find out whether those decisions would be applicable to this case or not.
Apple Computer Inc. vs Apple Leasing & Industries on 4 May, 1991
33. The Delhi High Court in Apple Computer Inc. v. Apple Leasing and Industries, 1993 (1) IPLR 63 would hold thus :--
N.R. Dongre And Ors vs Whirlpool Corporation And Anr on 30 August, 1996
37. It would be appropriate, at this stage, to refer to the views of Dr. Justice A. S. Anand, the Honourable Judge of the Supreme Court made in an article published in under the caption "Intellectual Property Rights -- The Indian Experience" after referring to the Whirlpool case, , as given below :--
Wwf International vs Mahavir Spinning Mills Ltd. on 7 October, 1994
In yet another case in WWF International v. Mahavir Spinning Mills Ltd., 1994 PTC 250, the Delhi High Court considered the question at length and made the following observation :--
The Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958
William Grant & Sons Ltd. vs Mcdowell & Compay Ltd. on 27 May, 1994
34. The same High Court in William Grant and Sons Ltd. v. McDowell and Co. Ltd., AIR 9721/93 in Suit No. 2532 of 1993 judgment dated 27-5-1994 on the question of trans-border reputation, would observe as follows :--
1