Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.91 seconds)

Ranjitha Balasubramanian And Anr. vs Shanthi Group And Ors. on 12 December, 2006

16. If the principles held in the above decision are applied to the case on hand, similar is the situation in the case on hand as even in this case the person who filed the complaint i.e., Naveen has not produced power of attorney. Though a zerox copy of the same is filed to the court, same cannot be considered as a document by this court as same is not having any legal sanctity in the eyes of law. In the absence of such authority, his sworn statement has been recorded and summons was issued to the accused. As it is clear that the said Naveen who filed the complaint had no authority to present the complaint, the complaint on hand is liable to be dismissed. In other words, this Court is of the view that the complaint is not maintainable in the eyes of law and such defect is an incurable SCCH­14 11 CC.No.3420/2020 defect. Mere examining the other respective power of attorney holder at a subsequent stage of the proceedings cannot cure the defect. Hence, with all these observations, I proceed to answer Point No.1 in the 'Negative'.
Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 5 - V G Sabhahit - Full Document
1