Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.89 seconds)

Dr. A.K. Jain & Ors. Etc.Yetc vs Union Of India & Ors on 24 September, 1987

15. Mr. Grover has relied upon some Supreme Court judgments and wanted us to follow suit. But we find it difficult to do so because none of the cited judgments could be treated an authority on the point in issue. It is true that Supreme Court directed regularisation of services of adhoc doctors in Dr. A.K. Jain's case but that was done only in exercise of powers under Article 142 of the Constitution in the facts and circumstances of that case which did not constitute the binding precedent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 30 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document

Jacob M. Puthuparambil And Ors. Etc. Etc vs Kerala Water Authority And Ors. Etc. Etc on 19 September, 1990

In Jacob's case, however, Supreme Court directed regularisation of services of temporary employees of Kerala Water Authority in terms of Rule 9E of Kerela Subordinate Services Rules which provided for such power of regularisation. Therefore, none of these judgment could advance petitioners' case, nor was there any scope otherwise to direct regularisation of their services.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 315 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document
1