Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.35 seconds)

Uday vs State Of Karnataka on 19 February, 2003

27. The appellant/accused was also convicted for the commission of offence under Section 417 IPC. The scope of Section 417 IPC has been considered in the judgment rendered by the Calcutta High Court reported in 2005 Crl.L J 3462, which in turn placed reliance upon Uday vs. State of Karnataka, [2003 SCC 775] cited supra in the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India observed that the victim, thus, freely exercised a choice between resistance and assent and she must have known the consequences of the fact, particularly, when she was conscious of the fact that their marriage may not take place at all on account of caste consideration and on the facts of the case found that the victim freely, voluntarily and consciously consented to have physical relationship with the appellant and consequently, her consent was not in consequence of any misconception of fact.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 736 - B P Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next