Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.22 seconds)
Dr. Bhimrao vs Sushila . on 14 December, 2017 cites

General Manager, Kerala S.R.T.C vs Susamma Thomas on 6 January, 1993

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we accept the finding recorded by the High Court that the Insurer is not liable. However, regard being had to the plight of the appellant, we intend to invoke the policy of pay and recover. We, accordingly, direct the respondent No.1 to deposit the amount, as directed by the Tribunal, if not already deposited, before the Tribunal within twelve weeks hence, which shall be disbursed in favour of the appellant in accordance with the law laid down in the case of General Manger, Kerala CA 6379/2013 21 State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum v. Susamma Thomas (Mrs.) & Ors., (1994) 2 SCC 176. Be it clarified that we have invoked the policy of pay and recover in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and if any amount is paid under the head of `No Fault Policy', the same shall be recovered.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 4294 - G N Ray - Full Document

Mukund Dewangan vs Oriental Ins.Co.Ltd on 11 February, 2016

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5826 OF 2011 Mukund Dewangan Appellant(s) Versus Oriental Insurance Company Limited Respondent(s) O R D E R Mr. S.L. Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the insurer very fairly stated that the controversy is already covered by the decision rendered in Mukund Dewangan vs. Oriental Insurance Company Limited (2017) 7 SCALE 731.
Supreme Court of India Cites 55 - Cited by 2801 - A Mishra - Full Document

United India Insurance Company Ltd vs Lehru And Ors on 28 February, 2003

“The appellant, Insurance Company has, therefore, successfully proved the breach of the terms of policy. The appellant was therefore, entitled to the recovery rights. (United India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Lehru & Ors. (2003) 3 SCC 338; Skandia Insurance company Limited v. Kokilaben Chandravadan (1987) 2 SCC 654 and national Insurance Company Limited v. Swaran Singh & Ors. (2004) 3 SCC 297).
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 848 - Full Document

Skandia Insurance Co. Ltd vs Kokilaben Chandravadan & Ors on 1 April, 1987

“The appellant, Insurance Company has, therefore, successfully proved the breach of the terms of policy. The appellant was therefore, entitled to the recovery rights. (United India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Lehru & Ors. (2003) 3 SCC 338; Skandia Insurance company Limited v. Kokilaben Chandravadan (1987) 2 SCC 654 and national Insurance Company Limited v. Swaran Singh & Ors. (2004) 3 SCC 297).
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 623 - M P Thakkar - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Swaran Singh & Ors on 5 January, 2004

“The appellant, Insurance Company has, therefore, successfully proved the breach of the terms of policy. The appellant was therefore, entitled to the recovery rights. (United India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Lehru & Ors. (2003) 3 SCC 338; Skandia Insurance company Limited v. Kokilaben Chandravadan (1987) 2 SCC 654 and national Insurance Company Limited v. Swaran Singh & Ors. (2004) 3 SCC 297).
Supreme Court of India Cites 68 - Cited by 3847 - Full Document
1