Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.25 seconds)

Bhagyoday Coop.Bank Ltd., Ahmedabad vs Natvarlal K. Patel on 15 December, 2009

The petition is containing the challenge to the order of the Tribunal only in so far it denies back wages to the petitioner. The petitioner is approaching this court invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Full Bench of this Court in a decision in case of THE BHAGYODAYA COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. VS. NATWARLAL K. PATEL AND OTHERS, reported in 2011 (3) GLH (FB) 89 held that when the petition is brought under Article 226 containing the challenge to the subordinate Tribunal s order, this Tribunal is required to be joined as party. In the instant case, the petitioner has not joined the Tribunal as a party and therefore, on this ground the petition is required to be dismissed for non-joinder of the parties, as, as per the observation of the Full Court, no petition could be maintained under Article 226 without joining the concerned Tribunal as party respondent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 58 - Full Document
1